We have a '93 Mustang convertible that we have had for 11 years that just rolled over 300,000 miles that we have kept up on pretty well, it needs a top and a coat of paint but otherwise it is like an anvil. Even the A4LD is original, just serviced regularly, etc. The engine uses no oil, is quiet as a mouse and it has no blow by. Not a leak anywhere, just timing belts, a new radiator and a water pump. Amazing engine and car overall. I wouldn't really be too afraid to turbo charge it as it is, but 300,000 miles...
I have a chance to get hands on another '93 2.3L twin plug, EFI like mine as a good rebuild able spare. But what I was thinking was kicking it up a notch. I am thinking of a forged piston, 2.3 and a turbo. Now turbos are kind of new to me. I would like to get a fairly modest 200 hp out of it on pump gas, nothing exotic, and it has to be reliable, daily driver reliable. I think it would make for about as much as a convertible needs to be, plus it would be more efficient. I don't know if I should use the stock cam, or whatever.
Can someone educate me? I ran 2.0-2.3s back in the '70s in mini stocks, but thats carbed, very high compression, etc. This would be something that would be dependable.
I have a chance to get hands on another '93 2.3L twin plug, EFI like mine as a good rebuild able spare. But what I was thinking was kicking it up a notch. I am thinking of a forged piston, 2.3 and a turbo. Now turbos are kind of new to me. I would like to get a fairly modest 200 hp out of it on pump gas, nothing exotic, and it has to be reliable, daily driver reliable. I think it would make for about as much as a convertible needs to be, plus it would be more efficient. I don't know if I should use the stock cam, or whatever.
Can someone educate me? I ran 2.0-2.3s back in the '70s in mini stocks, but thats carbed, very high compression, etc. This would be something that would be dependable.
Comment