Just like Judge Wapner always said "Get it in writing."
And I wonder how Bruton's expensive cadre of pettyfogging lawyers are getting around NC's "Statute of Frauds?"
The Statute of Frauds requires many documents to be in writing, including the following:
A promise which by its very terms cannot be performed with one year. . . .
The statute . . . requires that every "essential term" be in some written form. This language has usually been interpreted to require at least the following information: (1) the identity of the parties; (2) the subject matter of the contract; (3) the terms and conditions of the agreement; (4) the consideration given and received; and (5) the signature of the parties. As long as some document, note, or combination of papers contain this essential information, a court will enforce the contract. A related rule states that if there is a writing no oral agreement will be entertained to contradict the written agreement.
A promise which by its very terms cannot be performed with one year. . . .
The statute . . . requires that every "essential term" be in some written form. This language has usually been interpreted to require at least the following information: (1) the identity of the parties; (2) the subject matter of the contract; (3) the terms and conditions of the agreement; (4) the consideration given and received; and (5) the signature of the parties. As long as some document, note, or combination of papers contain this essential information, a court will enforce the contract. A related rule states that if there is a writing no oral agreement will be entertained to contradict the written agreement.
DOH!
"
Leave a comment: