Am I wrong to think this is a viable subject for times such as ours? It's a big American fastback, available with a big motor (albeit from the smog-motor days), and to top it all off - it's a fastback. When these came out my senior year I thought they were butt-ugly and laughable. I think Wally Booth campaigned one in Pro Stock, and of course it made a few bones in NASCAR trim. I would consider this for a modern street machine. Cut off the bumpers, fore and aft. Give a bit of rake. You have the makings of a serious hot rod that would get noticed among the sea of Chevelles and Mustangs. What do you think?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
70's AMC Matador
Collapse
X
-
Only 17k, quite a bargain someone got.
Pretty far down on my list of cars to buy, but so are Chevelles and Mustangs
Build one, have fun!
My fabulous web page
"If it don't go, chrome it!" --Stroker McGurk
-
Looks better without bumpers on,,, not a fan of that vinyl top either'86 Monte SS (sold) ~ HRPT 2015, '17, '18 ~ Long Hauler
'73 Dodge Coronet Wagon ~ ‘19 Long Hauler
79 Trans Am project
’90 Chevy 454 SS
Comment
-
Used a 73 or 76 Matador wagon front bumper (gotta be 73 as rear bumper was crap, most 73 had 5 mph bumpers up front only) welded up it was a strong one that was on 3 cars..yes got accusations of "loaded bumper" of course it was not...
Comment
-
I will say I like cars that appear to be bigger than they actually are. Cars that appear to be smaller are cool too. A 68-70 Dodge Charger feels huge. Bigger than a Super Bee or Roadrunner but the same size. Then a Cuda or Challenger looks smaller than all of them but is actually wider.
Those Matadors look massive, but aren't.My hobby is needing a hobby.
Comment
Comment