I was driving down the interstate a while back thinking about roadways, gas mileage, and how my vehicle, while the cruise control is on, responds to changes in the elevation of the roadway.
I realized the cruise control has a passive response to changes in grade, and I typically have an active response. I see the hill, and anticipate the vehicle will slow and increase throttle to compensate. With the cruise on, the vehicle has no way to anticipate the hill, so it finds itself 'playing catch up' to maintain the preset speed. This means the vehicle must use more throttle input (and more fuel) to catch back up.
With the proliferation of GPS technology in today's new vehicles, it looks like the cruise and the GPS could be integrated to allow the vehicle to anticipate these changes in grade, gradually increase vehicle speed (within reason lol) to minimize this 'catch up' time.
Anyway, that's BBR's deep thinking for the day. ;D
I realized the cruise control has a passive response to changes in grade, and I typically have an active response. I see the hill, and anticipate the vehicle will slow and increase throttle to compensate. With the cruise on, the vehicle has no way to anticipate the hill, so it finds itself 'playing catch up' to maintain the preset speed. This means the vehicle must use more throttle input (and more fuel) to catch back up.
With the proliferation of GPS technology in today's new vehicles, it looks like the cruise and the GPS could be integrated to allow the vehicle to anticipate these changes in grade, gradually increase vehicle speed (within reason lol) to minimize this 'catch up' time.
Anyway, that's BBR's deep thinking for the day. ;D
Comment