I am planning on ordering UMI rear control arms for the 12 bolt in the Monte Carlo SS. I was wondering if anyone has had any experience with the roto joint vs. the standard rod end/ heim joint. I was goint to go with the roto joint because it is the same price and seems like it will be a little more forgiving on a street car. Eventually the car should have a 500-600hp 509 in it and it will be a street strip car. For the power level I am looking for I doubt that I would be sacrificing anything with the roto joint. thoughts? Thanks in advance!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Any input or experience with UMI's Roto Joint?
Collapse
X
-
yes to the "roto joint"... they're also called rebuildable heim joints
whether or not I'd pay someone to weld a angle to a nut* for $100 - I dunno, but they work well
*buying a nut, a bit of channel and the 37.95 - IIRC, there are cheaper on ebay - joint would seem more cost effective.
(edit) oh yeah, and if you do get the ones where the cup threads out of the housing - pull the joint apart and put anti-seize on the threads before you get the joint wetLast edited by SuperBuickGuy; October 20, 2012, 07:54 AM.Doing it all wrong since 1966
-
I have UMI's double adjustable uppers and lowers with rotojoints at both ends and love them (This is on my '87 Monte SS).
I previously had a set of their non-adjustable uppers and lowers with poly bushings. Night and day difference in the way that the rear end "feels" when cornering.I take photos.
Comment
-
I bought some for my 66 Impala to make some custom upper control arms. The main reason why I bought them was because they were rebuildable and seemed better for street duty. A heim joint is my Plan B.
Nick Smithberg
www.smithbergracing.com
Comment
Comment