This 06 6 liter had plenty of oil gushing out of the dip stick tube. After pulling the cab to remove the head (for those of you not familiar with ford pulling the cab is the norm for most engine work) this is what I found.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Gotta love engine compresion in the crankcase
Collapse
X
-
Re: Gotta love engine compresion in the crankcase
ouch.
lemme guess "If one electronics box is better, then two must be betterer!!!!"
looks like what happens when you stack boxes that both advance timing... what was the actual diagnosis?? cool pics!!www.realtuners.com - catch the RealTuners Radio Podcast on Youtube, Facebook, iTunes, and anywhere else podcasts are distributed!
-
Re: Gotta love engine compresion in the crankcase
They do seem to be on the problematic side.
The part I don't get is that Ford owns/once owned an interest in Cummins Engine Company....why they didn't go with them, leaving Dodge to scoop up what is easily the best diesel engine in the pickup/1-ton market.
The 7.3 Powerstrokes are decent engines, the 6.9 NA's are DOGS.
Not sure I'd ever want to own a truck that I'd have to yank the cab off of to work on the damned engine.
Comment
-
Re: Gotta love engine compresion in the crankcase
Originally posted by tiresmoke!They do seem to be on the problematic side.
The part I don't get is that Ford owns/once owned an interest in Cummins Engine Company....why they didn't go with them, leaving Dodge to scoop up what is easily the best diesel engine in the pickup/1-ton market.
The 7.3 Powerstrokes are decent engines, the 6.9 NA's are DOGS.
Not sure I'd ever want to own a truck that I'd have to yank the cab off of to work on the damned engine.
just my opinion, but the best thing about the Cummins is the ease of maintenance. I can swap injectors in 45 minutes, almost like a set of spark plugs. That's an 8+ hour job in any of the V-diesels. The duramax, however, is definitely an awesome engine! the 6.4 TT Navistar seems a lot better than the poor 6.0 also.www.realtuners.com - catch the RealTuners Radio Podcast on Youtube, Facebook, iTunes, and anywhere else podcasts are distributed!
Comment
-
Re: Gotta love engine compresion in the crankcase
Originally posted by dieselgeekOriginally posted by tiresmoke!They do seem to be on the problematic side.
The part I don't get is that Ford owns/once owned an interest in Cummins Engine Company....why they didn't go with them, leaving Dodge to scoop up what is easily the best diesel engine in the pickup/1-ton market.
The 7.3 Powerstrokes are decent engines, the 6.9 NA's are DOGS.
Not sure I'd ever want to own a truck that I'd have to yank the cab off of to work on the damned engine.
just my opinion, but the best thing about the Cummins is the ease of maintenance. I can swap injectors in 45 minutes, almost like a set of spark plugs. That's an 8+ hour job in any of the V-diesels. The duramax, however, is definitely an awesome engine! the 6.4 TT Navistar seems a lot better than the poor 6.0 also.
We rented a 2 ton International 4200 moving truck last weekend to move the storage. It was a V-8, where I would have figured it would have a DT-466 inline, is that a 6.4?
Comment
-
Re: Gotta love engine compresion in the crankcase
My considerable experience with these engines (ran lots of 'em on a dyno). I don't know why Ford went with the Power Stroke. The DT466 is bulletproof (they're in nearly every school bus in America), and the V8 was always fussy. The Cummins ISB engines (Dodge PU and others) is a super engine but I wish it was wet-sleeved. They had a bunch of bad blocks that cracked thru the water jackets, but that's now fixed - I had to re-block one of our dyno motors in the middle of a test program (not a good thing). Not much experience with the Isuzu, but generally Japanese Diesels are pretty bulletproof.
Non-Diesel guys - note the "Mexican Hat" in the piston crown. That's the combustion chamber. Riccardo in England did considerable research many years ago and found this to be the optimum design for the chamber. Subsequently, much research has gone into refining the shape, but the concept still holds true. There is very little squish volume outside of that chamber when the piston is at TDC, which is one of the reasons that Diesels have low HC and CO emissions (no dead gasses in the corners).
More specifics - PM me.
Dan
Comment
-
Re: Gotta love engine compresion in the crankcase
I've got over 500k on 7.3's and driven all the others at one time or another...
Here was my problem with the 6.0... they made more HP and Torque out of less cubes... and said it would get better mileage.... Hmmm ahhhh okay so I can have more everything in Less Motor??? Some how that just doesn't seem right.
Someone said that you can have 2 of three things... but not all three , it's truly believable.
Price
Performance
Endurance
K
Comment
-
Re: Gotta love engine compresion in the crankcase
The DT-466 is probably the gold standard light to medium duty engine out there. That said a DI Powerstroke had very few flaws, really o-rings for the injectors were about the only major maintenance item that determined life or death. If they started passing oil, death was on its way from excessive pressures in the cylinders. The IDI motors were about as low maintenance as you can get for a diesel, less mileage and power, but man those things lived forever. Scott's comment on the Cummins is a good one, back when I spun wrenches I could service the injectors bleed and time the pump while you are still getting the valvetrain off a 7.3.
GMs smartest move was ditching the 6.5 and going to the Isuzu. Good architecture for its application and people are putting unholy amounts of boost to them. I am still a 2-stroke Detroit diesel fan even though they are really obsolete and dirty. A turbocharged 3-71 in a 3/4 ton 4X4 pickup comes to mind as pretty sweet. ;D
Comment
-
Re: Gotta love engine compresion in the crankcase
Oh Bill! You old fossil (from one fossil to another). The 2 strokers are fun, but I don't really want to own one. Still, we have some fire trucks here in town with 'em (not sure what size) and I love to hear them go by, chopping the air as they go. It's a unique auditory experience.
Dan
Comment
-
Re: Gotta love engine compresion in the crankcase
Originally posted by BillBallinger SrThe DT-466 is probably the gold standard light to medium duty engine out there. That said a DI Powerstroke had very few flaws, really o-rings for the injectors were about the only major maintenance item that determined life or death. If they started passing oil, death was on its way from excessive pressures in the cylinders. The IDI motors were about as low maintenance as you can get for a diesel, less mileage and power, but man those things lived forever. Scott's comment on the Cummins is a good one, back when I spun wrenches I could service the injectors bleed and time the pump while you are still getting the valvetrain off a 7.3.
GMs smartest move was ditching the 6.5 and going to the Isuzu. Good architecture for its application and people are putting unholy amounts of boost to them. I am still a 2-stroke Detroit diesel fan even though they are really obsolete and dirty. A turbocharged 3-71 in a 3/4 ton 4X4 pickup comes to mind as pretty sweet. ;DOriginal Carjunkie TV Member
Comment
Comment