Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1969 c-10

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Captain
    replied
    That left over "Mouse House" cauterized the remaining rust out !!

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyWhiteBoy
    replied
    A little more cleaning on the fenders, and welding on the hood.
    It looks like I didn't get all of the mouse house out.
    To borrow Dave's term....Ah, the smell of burning "used mouse food" just before bed. I could taste it


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220525_135931725.jpg
Views:	161
Size:	164.7 KB
ID:	1319515

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220524_125208281.jpg
Views:	156
Size:	189.5 KB
ID:	1319516


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220524_125225531.jpg
Views:	155
Size:	155.3 KB
ID:	1319517​​​​​​​

    Leave a comment:


  • Deaf Bob
    replied
    Old days. Lead?

    Leave a comment:


  • DanStokes
    replied
    Looks fine to me but I'm not MP&C!

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyWhiteBoy
    replied
    This weekend has been dedicated to a couple science experiments.
    (I didn't want to sandblast in the heat/humidity...cooler next week)

    I didn't have much expectation from this product from Harbor Freight.
    I soaked a paper towel with the evap-o-rust and let it soak on a pitted spot on the hood for 2 hours.
    A quick pass with a wire wheel in a drill and I was pretty happy with the result.
    This spot had been gone over with a da sander with little result.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220522_113148407.jpg
Views:	195
Size:	160.5 KB
ID:	1319332

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220522_122126908.jpg
Views:	182
Size:	259.6 KB
ID:	1319333


    The other experiment was to see how bad I could F-UP the front of the hood.
    It was very thin and had several small holes.
    I believe mostly from a series of mouse nests packed under the brace in the nose of the hood.
    This hood has NO access for planishing a weld should you need to put in a patch.
    So the decision was made to try to weld them up...I'm glad no one was here to watch.
    The worst case was that I might have to cut it out and make a patch.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220521_102437207.jpg
Views:	186
Size:	188.0 KB
ID:	1319334

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220521_121216305.jpg
Views:	185
Size:	176.3 KB
ID:	1319335


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220521_182422453.jpg
Views:	186
Size:	190.6 KB
ID:	1319336


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220521_192747138.jpg
Views:	185
Size:	192.5 KB
ID:	1319337


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220522_121802220.jpg
Views:	185
Size:	183.8 KB
ID:	1319338


    Still a work in progress.
    I think putting in a patch would have been faster for me, but this should take less filler due to lack of access to the back of the panel.


    Feel free to chime in on the proper way. I really didn't want to remove the brace, but that was all I could think of.

    I hope everyone is having a great weekend!

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain
    replied
    "Beautimous" !!!

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyWhiteBoy
    replied
    I'm happy to report, the Road Warrior van completed its 1500 mi. journey without any drama......

    I've had a couple days in the shop, so I'll post up a couple pix.

    Not for your entertainment, but to try to stay motivated There's plenty of actual skilled people here for y'all to be entertained by. 



    Just a little hot glue to go......I hope

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220518_192607602.jpg
Views:	218
Size:	153.2 KB
ID:	1319202

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220518_192639127.jpg
Views:	211
Size:	134.2 KB
ID:	1319203



    I thought this was going to be a quick one. It only had very few holes, but the front lower bits and pieces were all paper thin.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220519_113519582.jpg
Views:	207
Size:	179.0 KB
ID:	1319204

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220519_140820128.jpg
Views:	204
Size:	168.5 KB
ID:	1319205
    Now I have something to weld to....I don't have the skill to weld the paper thin stuff......"A man has got to know his limitations" -Harry Calahan

    Hopefully the fenders will be ready for mock up this weekend.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220519_184632908.jpg
Views:	208
Size:	160.2 KB
ID:	1319206

    Leave a comment:


  • DanStokes
    replied
    I'm with you, DWB. My 318 Dakota was great and it hauled the Camaro to the track many times w/o fail. When the track moved over a mountain range from here I bought the Diesel and that's been even better.

    I agree that the WRX hatch was a good thing. Our DIL just bought a clean WRX sedan (2019 I think) and it's a nice car though the hatch would have been a nice feature. SBG - the head gasket failure was on one specific engine family (EJ25 IIRC) and there's a MLS head gasket available that fixes it forever - I've done 2 of them for/with my brother. We got one fixed then he just HAD to have a Baja so we did a second one when he sold the wagon to get the Baja. The newer ones don't do the head gasket thing.

    Dan

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyWhiteBoy
    replied
    Originally posted by SuperBuickGuy View Post

    Uh, not to be mean, but is that a upward move? Subarus have a bit of a reputation for really liking a new set of headgaskets....

    Too many people I know know of the 60k trans replace requirement of the midsized Dodge....
    HaHa , nope, except in the fun department.
    The Grand Cherokee was much nicer when it actually worked. It was just too much hassle. The dealership was an hour away. We needed warranty work every few months. It was like that thing was cursed. At that time she was commuting 90 miles a day. The WRX paid for itself in fuel savings when prices were spiking the last time.

    The subie was great fun and reliable for us. That is, until it was rear ended at a stop light .....by a texting driver. She would have gotten another, but the hatchback was phased out in the WRX line.

    Leave a comment:


  • SuperBuickGuy
    replied
    Originally posted by DirtyWhiteBoy View Post

    I don't know if my Dakota RT had a "mini transmission" behind the 360 Magnum engine or not.
    It towed my enclosed MX race trailer, our 4 wheeler trailer, and my boat like no factory S-10 could dream of doing. I put 80K on it with zero issues
    .
    In contrast, our 07 Grand Cherokee (with a Hemi) was in the shop more than any vehicle I've ever owned... it was my wife's daily.
    Lifetime drivetrain warranty my ass, she dumped that pig for a STI hatchback
    Uh, not to be mean, but is that a upward move? Subarus have a bit of a reputation for really liking a new set of headgaskets....

    Too many people I know know of the 60k trans replace requirement of the midsized Dodge....

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyWhiteBoy
    replied
    Originally posted by SuperBuickGuy View Post

    you're the only person I know who thinks the Dodge mini transmission is better then the GM one....
    I don't know if my Dakota RT had a "mini transmission" behind the 360 Magnum engine or not.
    It towed my enclosed MX race trailer, our 4 wheeler trailer, and my boat like no factory S-10 could dream of doing. I put 80K on it with zero issues
    .
    In contrast, our 07 Grand Cherokee (with a Hemi) was in the shop more than any vehicle I've ever owned... it was my wife's daily.
    Lifetime drivetrain warranty my ass, she dumped that pig for a STI hatchback

    Leave a comment:


  • SuperBuickGuy
    replied
    Originally posted by DirtyWhiteBoy View Post

    No question they would have sold even better.

    I had a Dakota RT with the 360. It wasn't fast, but it was a better in every way than any of the "S" series I ever had (at least in stock form).
    you're the only person I know who thinks the Dodge mini transmission is better then the GM one....

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyWhiteBoy
    replied
    Originally posted by SuperBuickGuy View Post

    Can't imagine why GM didn't just put a SBC in the s10s - that said, that is the single best fix you can do for them... I built a bunch as flippers....
    No question they would have sold even better.

    I had a Dakota RT with the 360. It wasn't fast, but it was a better in every way than any of the "S" series I ever had (at least in stock form).

    Leave a comment:


  • SuperBuickGuy
    replied
    Originally posted by DirtyWhiteBoy View Post

    Thanks. If it still has a 2.8, I'm surprised it still runs. I had two, both lost intake gaskets and filled the crank case with antifreeze wiping out the bearings. It seems like they all did that. a couple mechanic friends claim the 3.1 or 3.4 (I don't remember which) long block is a direct swap and a BIG improvement. I hated both of my 2.8 engines. My 2wd blazer ended up with a 383 when the 2.8 died. It was a lot more fun after that .....also a lot harder to keep on the road in the rain
    Can't imagine why GM didn't just put a SBC in the s10s - that said, that is the single best fix you can do for them... I built a bunch as flippers....

    Leave a comment:


  • Russell
    replied
    It's a little 96 Oldsmobile wagon. It's not a 3.4 Dad delivery the mail for a couple of years before SS kicked it it was his mail car. Now he uses it on the farm and to run errands. Not worth anything but it almost irreplaceable (for what it's worth).

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X