Lowering Input

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gwood74
    Superhero BangShifter
    • Mar 2013
    • 497

    #1

    Lowering Input

    I am getting ready to lower my 74 Chevelle, I have springs and front spindles. Do I go all the in with spindles and springs or just start with springs first?
    HRPT 12 Miami and Stillwater, OK, 13 Arlington to Memphis, 14/15 Vetoed by Wife, 16 Long Haul, 17/18/19 motor fiasco
  • Beagle
    "Flounder"
    • Apr 2011
    • 13804

    #2
    you might hit up Blazerteam in private message if this doesn't get a response, and really some more design goals might be helpful. Do you want it to plow dirt in the driveway or just a little drop? I'd try the springs first myself but I don't like cars that are really low. I like them, I should say I don't like to drive them. I forget and whack things like gas station entrances, sharp angle driveways, that sort of thing.

    Oh yeah, how are the roads there? Potholes and oil pans are an ugly partnership.
    Flying south, with a flock of bird dogs.

    Comment

    • Gwood74
      Superhero BangShifter
      • Mar 2013
      • 497

      #3
      By no means am I wanting to plow dirt, just looking for some stance. Nor do I want it really low, just sold a Civic that was that way. The roads I hit are usually clear of potholes....lol
      HRPT 12 Miami and Stillwater, OK, 13 Arlington to Memphis, 14/15 Vetoed by Wife, 16 Long Haul, 17/18/19 motor fiasco

      Comment

      • cstmwgn
        Wagon Master
        • Oct 2007
        • 6134

        #4
        I think I would go with the spindles first - yes it is more work but it will maintain the travel of the front suspension where as the lowering springs (shorter/weaker/whatever) will reduce your travel by the amount they lower the front end.

        Comment

        • Barry Donovan
          No Life Outside BangShift.com
          • Jul 2009
          • 16928

          #5
          I had a chevelle, 1974.

          the I-6 after swapping to v8, smack the front end off the ground.

          maybe use that as a reference point, go slightly heavier than the I-6 rate, and the height has been figured out by any company willing to help you figure it out.

          I never got to that chore, but that is how I deciphered it.

          there is a flex to have, gm did not let the big chevelles move around much.
          Previously boxer3main
          the death rate and fairy tales cannot kill the nature left behind.

          Comment

          • MR P-BODY
            Superhero BangShifter
            • Apr 2012
            • 2359

            #6
            Originally posted by cstmwgn View Post
            I think I would go with the spindles first - yes it is more work but it will maintain the travel of the front suspension where as the lowering springs (shorter/weaker/whatever) will reduce your travel by the amount they lower the front end.
            I agree .. it keeps the stiffer springs on it and yet lowers the body

            Comment

            • MadmanMark
              Superhero BangShifter
              • Nov 2007
              • 665

              #7
              I know my 69 isn't the same, but I cut some coil to lower it and really messed up the handling (brought it down 2-3"). I switched to some Hotchkis lowering springs, which only brought it about 1-2" down but didn't mess up the handling. The best handling improvement seemed to be from some new upper control arms (SpeedTech) that improved the camber curve and added some positive caster.
              Tampa, FL

              Comment

              • kyhunter89
                Superhero BangShifter
                • Jan 2008
                • 1375

                #8
                Pictures of how it sits now might help. 2" drop spindles and 2" drop springs?
                Si vis pacem, para bellum

                Comment

                • Gwood74
                  Superhero BangShifter
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 497

                  #9
                  I have 2" inch drop spindles and 2" Belltech springs waiting to go on
                  Originally posted by kyhunter89 View Post
                  Pictures of how it sits now might help. 2" drop spindles and 2" drop springs?
                  Last edited by Gwood74; May 14, 2013, 06:33 PM.
                  HRPT 12 Miami and Stillwater, OK, 13 Arlington to Memphis, 14/15 Vetoed by Wife, 16 Long Haul, 17/18/19 motor fiasco

                  Comment

                  • antmnte
                    Legendary BangShifter
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 5010

                    #10
                    Check here too----G3GM.com lots of guys lower their cars,one guy on there just did his Monte with DSE springs all around and stock spindles,looks good, I might do mine like that.

                    Comment

                    • Scott Liggett
                      No Life Outside BangShift.com
                      • Oct 2007
                      • 21561

                      #11
                      If you buy 2" drop spindles, buy stock springs to start; or just use your old ones for reference. The drop spindles move the spindle shaft up. The spindle height doesn't change. Adding 2" drop springs would put the car on the cross member. The nice thing about drop spindles is that you keep the full suspension travel.

                      Obviously, drop springs are cheaper. No matter what springs I've bought dropped, or not, I've ended up doing some cutting to get the height I want.
                      BS'er formally known as Rebeldryver

                      Resident Instigator

                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      Working...