Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anybody need 5 V12 GMC engines???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Anybody need 5 V12 GMC engines???

    Nitrous is like that hot chick with crabs. you want to hit it, you're just afraid of the consequences

  • #2
    interesting stuff.

    the fact that putting the crazy 60 degree six into a normal resonance of v12..always interesting.

    I learned about that engine in the military, they were having a goal to make gas be as robust as diesel. of course that is ridiculous..

    but that is an awesome thing to preserve.
    as most engine gurus know, a v6 is never correct at the crank..
    the photo of the v12 version, they really can get a good price from the right person. making a 12 out of the crazy 6 even took a good (proper) crank.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Barry Donovan; June 9, 2013, 10:26 AM.
    Previously boxer3main
    the death rate and fairy tales cannot kill the nature left behind.

    Comment


    • #3
      I dont need 5, but in my mind I "need" one of them. Wonder what they used them for? some kind of mobile powerplant?

      Ill take one with Flannel valvecovers for my 64, Or a 409.
      Si vis pacem, para bellum

      Comment


      • #4
        twin six
        2 305s in one box

        Comment


        • #5
          industrial and stuff like fire trucks.

          I had a couple of the V6 engines, sold it all for $150. I guess scrap metal is worth more in Kansas.
          My fabulous web page

          "If it don't go, chrome it!" --Stroker McGurk

          Comment


          • #6
            The guy at Thunder V12 will probably buy them all.

            1970 Camaro RS - SOLD | 2000 Camaro SS - Traded in for a Hyundai...
            1966 Ford Thunderbird - SOLD | 1963 MGB, abandoned V8 project, FOR SALE/SCRAP

            1978 Cutlass - Post Lay-off daily driver

            Comment


            • #7
              1970 Camaro RS - SOLD | 2000 Camaro SS - Traded in for a Hyundai...
              1966 Ford Thunderbird - SOLD | 1963 MGB, abandoned V8 project, FOR SALE/SCRAP

              1978 Cutlass - Post Lay-off daily driver

              Comment


              • #8
                I could use 3 of the cranks for my Deltic project and go with a monster 18cylinder vs. the 9 I have planned. However that would probably make it locomotive vs. automotive sized again.

                I want the 401 Magnum V6 to play with.
                Central TEXAS Sleeper
                USAF Physicist

                ROA# 9790

                Comment


                • #9
                  I want the 20,000 and he can keep the water pump mills. YIKES. Sorry - but YIKES I say. There are still a bunch of 392 hemi's on water pumps around, are they worth 4k a piece?
                  Flying south, with a flock of bird dogs.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by boxer3main View Post
                    interesting stuff.

                    the fact that putting the crazy 60 degree six into a normal resonance of v12..always interesting.

                    I learned about that engine in the military, they were having a goal to make gas be as robust as diesel. of course that is ridiculous..

                    but that is an awesome thing to preserve.
                    as most engine gurus know, a v6 is never correct at the crank..
                    the photo of the v12 version, they really can get a good price from the right person. making a 12 out of the crazy 6 even took a good (proper) crank.
                    As a V12 is two inline sixes, and an inline six is inherently balanced if using a normal crank, an interesting consequence is that a V12 will be balanced no matter what the angle of the V is. A 60 degree V6 would have balance issues you would not see on a 60 degree V12, and you could even build a V12 with some crazy angle like 73 degrees and keep it balanced.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Who would want an engine that can barely make 300 hp and weighs close to 1200 lbs?
                      BS'er formally known as Rebeldryver

                      Resident Instigator

                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Torque?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Deaf Bob View Post
                          Torque?
                          I'm sure they make great torque, but with their weight you might as well get a Detroit diesel from a dump truck.

                          They are an interesting part of automotive history, but not very useful.
                          BS'er formally known as Rebeldryver

                          Resident Instigator

                          sigpic

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Scott Liggett View Post
                            I'm sure they make great torque, but with their weight you might as well get a Detroit diesel from a dump truck.

                            They are an interesting part of automotive history, but not very useful.
                            True.. They'd make an awfully long hood in a rat rod.. Be unque at least..

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Scott Liggett View Post
                              Who would want an engine that can barely make 300 hp and weighs close to 1200 lbs?
                              Sounds like pretty much every 460 Ford I have ever seen...


                              It's really no different than trying to glue them back on after she has her way.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X