air density online has all four tracks between 1200 and 2000 feet this morning.i hope its comparable for us.
the air out there
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Using --> http://www.wallaceracing.com/convert-et-to-msa.php that puts the suckstang running 10.60's at 126. That may be a little optimistic though. hahaLife is short. Be a do'er and not a shoulda done'er.
1969 Galaxie 500 https://bangshift.com/forum/forum/ba...ild-it-s-alive
1998 Mustang GT https://bangshift.com/forum/forum/ba...60-and-a-turbo
1983 Mustang GT 545/552/302/Turbo302/552 http://www.bangshift.com/forum/forum...485-bbr-s-83gt
1973 F-250 BBF Turbo Truck http://www.bangshift.com/forum/forum...uck-conversion
1986 Ford Ranger EFI 545/C6 https://bangshift.com/forum/forum/ba...tooth-and-nail -
ol 4 eyes will be deep in the 10s for sure.mine should be in hi 10s.63 Plymouth DW 2011 Quickest Mopar 11.38@119 Daily DriverComment
-
me too.but it fires me up knowing im gonna gain 80 hp or better just in elevation.woohoo63 Plymouth DW 2011 Quickest Mopar 11.38@119 Daily DriverComment
-
Whats the grains of water down there?2007 SBN/A Drag Week Winner & First only SBN/A Car in the 9's Till 2012
First to run in the .90s .80s and .70's in SBN/A
2012 SSBN/A Drag Week Winner First in the 9.60's/ 9.67 @ 139 1.42 60'
2013 SSBN/A Drag Week, Lets quit sand bagging, and let it rip!Comment
-
-
It's a big deal to moparman63 and I because we normally see DA's in the 6500-6900' range!!!!!Life is short. Be a do'er and not a shoulda done'er.
1969 Galaxie 500 https://bangshift.com/forum/forum/ba...ild-it-s-alive
1998 Mustang GT https://bangshift.com/forum/forum/ba...60-and-a-turbo
1983 Mustang GT 545/552/302/Turbo302/552 http://www.bangshift.com/forum/forum...485-bbr-s-83gt
1973 F-250 BBF Turbo Truck http://www.bangshift.com/forum/forum...uck-conversion
1986 Ford Ranger EFI 545/C6 https://bangshift.com/forum/forum/ba...tooth-and-nailComment
-
-
-
Seems the cars that are going from high elevation to lower elevation, really never see what they expect. Your engines are underheaded on purpose up there.......because of the bad air..........down here they go into choke.Last edited by lun40119; August 20, 2012, 07:21 AM.Team Clueless
1st Place SB/NA DW12
2nd Place SB/NA DW11
sigpicComment
-
-
Don't you remember DW last year when everyone was looking at their time slips in Amarillo wondering where they lost 0.5 sec from the day before?Originally posted by lun40119 View PostSeems the cars that are going from high elevation to lower elevation, really never see what they expect. Your engines are underheaded on purpose up there.......because of the bad air..........down here they go into choke.
I talked to plenty of guys that were!
**nevermind** I see what you are sayin'.Last edited by BBR; August 20, 2012, 07:46 AM.Life is short. Be a do'er and not a shoulda done'er.
1969 Galaxie 500 https://bangshift.com/forum/forum/ba...ild-it-s-alive
1998 Mustang GT https://bangshift.com/forum/forum/ba...60-and-a-turbo
1983 Mustang GT 545/552/302/Turbo302/552 http://www.bangshift.com/forum/forum...485-bbr-s-83gt
1973 F-250 BBF Turbo Truck http://www.bangshift.com/forum/forum...uck-conversion
1986 Ford Ranger EFI 545/C6 https://bangshift.com/forum/forum/ba...tooth-and-nailComment
-
Right.........exactly.........I am not disagreeing. The change depends on where the engine was built. To run in the DA that you run in, my engine would need considerably less head. I lost .7 in Amarillo. In order to be optimal at your elevation, you need less cylinder head to keep airspeed up. When you come down to sea level, you will not see the gain that you think you will...........your cylinder head will be too small, and go into choke early. How do you fit 10lbs of shit in a 5lb box?
An engine built to operate at sea level will be over headed at 5000ft. The same goes for you guys........and engine built at elevation, will be under headed at Sea Level..............catch my drift?Team Clueless
1st Place SB/NA DW12
2nd Place SB/NA DW11
sigpicComment

Comment