.

the car junkie daily magazine.

.

Test Your Gearhead Knowlegde: A Mea Culpa, Yesterday’s Answer, and Today’s Challenging Part!


Test Your Gearhead Knowlegde: A Mea Culpa, Yesterday’s Answer, and Today’s Challenging Part!

First off, an apology. The other day I totally screwed the pooch and identified a 1929 Dodge flatead four banger as a Crosley mill. Gino Ofria had sent the photos over and I screwed up the order when I cataloged them. I knew that the little COBRA sheetmetal engine was an OHV mill but thought that the flattie was an earlier engine or something of that sort. It was an earlier engine…from a different company! Anyway, because of this horrendous mistake, I gave myself forty lashes with a wet timing belt as punishment. My wife is still looking at me funny.

Ok, so on to happier subjects like identifying that totally weird looking engine we showed you a couple photos of yesterday.  That engine is a 1913 Peugeot L45 of which three were originally made and of those three, you are looking at the only known survivor. This was the engine that won the 1916 Indy 500 and according to the Valley Head Service guys, this baby was space age tech for its day with dual overhead cams and a bunch of other stuff that didn’t start appearing in mass produced engines for many, many decades. This engine went into a car owned by the famous Lindley Bothwell. Bothwell was a big time California citrus farmer and also the dude who invented the “moving card trick” that is often seen at stadiums. This is the deal where people all hold up cars of different colors to form large pictures, flags, etc. An oddly cool footnote in history is Mr Bothwell!

Ok, now onto today’s challenge – we’re jumping back to the east coast at Custom Auto Machine in Weymouth, Massachusetts. Tell us what this intake manifold fits! There are two correct answers (two different manufacturers engine families!) — give us your best guess!

 


  • Share This
  • Pinterest
  • 0

9 thoughts on “Test Your Gearhead Knowlegde: A Mea Culpa, Yesterday’s Answer, and Today’s Challenging Part!

  1. C1BAD66

    Cadillac, without exhaust cross-over, for Rochester 2-barrels.

    Likely for 1st-gen V-8, ’49-’53…

    1. C1BAD66

      On second glance at the angles of the carb mounting surfaces, the engines hadda be mounted at a steep angle front to back, nearing 6-8°. ‘Probably required separate air cleaners or a stepped single mounting base. ‘Looks like the idea was to keep the float bowls level with a seriously “raked” engine mounting system…

  2. John Brown

    The only manifold that I know of that fits two engines (not really well though) is one for Cadillac and Studebaker. Above poster got it first, I’m a little too late to the party, as usual.

  3. Robert M.

    The original manufacturer was Leo Smoljan out of Orange Cove, CA. They are/were? reproduced by Dave Thibeault. It is made to fit a Studebaker V8 (&Caddy?).

Comments are closed.